请yma兄明确所给“x的x次方的x次方”的数学表达式的含意究竟是“x的(x次方的x次方)”还是“(x的x次方)的x次方”。它们代表不同的量。对于指数,结合律不成立。 |
You compute the exponent from the top to the bottom. For example 2 3 4 means 4^9 not 64^2. |
That's okay for finite case. Then, what is the definition of you expression with infinitely (but countablely) many x? |
Hu兄看看能否回答yinyin贴在下边的问题. |
没关系喽,Hu兄不是专门搞数学的,有此数学修养和兴趣已是很不了不起了。 yinyin觉得,要把Hu兄和yma兄在有限情况下的定义推广到无穷情况是有一定困难的。似乎唯一的“办法”是对每个x>0直接用方程y=x^y 的解来定义y。但这样一来,yma兄所提的问题也就意思大不一样(变为“试求解方程y=x^y,并求当x趋于0+时解的极限”),而且也就没有必要写出那个表达式了。 |
For each fixed x, you may define y_n = x^(x^(x^....)), with n x's. Then, let y = lim_{n\to infinity} ..., but you need to prove such limit exist. |
This is just my understanding, but Mr. yma does not agree with it since it does not satisfy equation y=x^y for given x (0 With such an understanding, I have shown the value of its limit when x goes to 0+ before. |
The limit exists when 0 |
欢迎光临 珍珠湾ART (http://66.160.158.134/) | Powered by Discuz! X3 |